Open Access & Market Structure

Order 888 1996

FERC Order 888 (1996) — Open Access Transmission Service (OATT) and Functional Unbundling

Order 888 (RM95-8-000, April 1996) required public utilities with interstate transmission to file a pro forma OATT, functionally unbundle transmission from generation, and provide comparable open access—the foundational rule for competitive wholesale electricity markets.

Reference page · Issued 1996 · Updated 2026-07-15

What This Order Did

In Order No. 888, issued April 24, 1996 in Docket RM95-8-000, FERC established the foundational framework for open, non-discriminatory access to electric transmission systems across the United States. The Commission found that vertically integrated public utilities had used control of transmission to favor their own generation and block competitors, frustrating Congress's goal of wholesale competition under the Federal Power Act. Order 888 required every public utility that owns, controls, or operates interstate transmission facilities to offer transmission service to all eligible customers on comparable terms under a pro forma Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT).

The order mandated functional unbundling: utilities had to separate their transmission operations from wholesale power marketing and generation functions so that transmission employees and information could not be used to give affiliates an unfair advantage. FERC defined firm and non-firm point-to-point transmission service, network integration transmission service for load-serving entities, and a core set of ancillary services that transmission customers could purchase alongside transmission. The pro forma OATT standardized terms for application, scheduling, curtailment, and billing so that a generator in one region could understand how to obtain service in another.

Order 888 also addressed stranded costs—the legitimate costs of generation and related assets that utilities argued could not be recovered if customers migrated to competitive suppliers once open access exposed them to market alternatives. FERC established a framework under which utilities could seek Commission approval for stranded cost recovery mechanisms, balancing the need to facilitate competition against concerns about shifting costs to remaining customers.

The order defined eligible customers broadly—including wholesale generators, power marketers, and load-serving entities seeking network service—and required reciprocity so utilities benefiting from open access in other regions could not deny comparable access at home. FERC preserved native-load obligations while opening paths for third-party transmission, and directed utilities to file compliance tariffs on Commission-approved timelines. The rulemaking responded to years of proceedings following the Energy Policy Act of 1992 and was issued alongside Order 889, which operationalized transparency requirements.

The order directed transmission providers to post available transfer capability and related transmission information, laying groundwork that Order 889 would operationalize through OASIS. Together, these reforms fundamentally restructured the wholesale electricity market by separating generation and transmission services and preventing utilities from favoring their own generation affiliates over competitors. Order 888 is widely regarded as the single most important FERC rulemaking in the transition from vertically integrated monopoly wholesale markets to open-access regional competition.

888
Order Number
1996
Year Issued
Open Access & Market Structure
Category

Who It Applies To

  • Public utilities that own, control, or operate interstate transmission facilities
  • Wholesale electricity buyers and sellers seeking non-discriminatory transmission access
  • Transmission customers requesting point-to-point or network integration service
  • State commissions and native-load utilities navigating stranded cost recovery filings

Key Holdings & Requirements

  • Required all jurisdictional public utilities to file a pro forma OATT offering comparable transmission service.
  • Mandated functional unbundling of transmission from generation and wholesale power marketing.
  • Established firm and non-firm point-to-point service and network integration transmission service.
  • Defined mandatory ancillary services and standardized tariff application and scheduling procedures.
  • Created a Commission-approved framework for stranded cost recovery when customers leave bundled service.
  • Required posting of available transmission capability to support transparent, non-discriminatory access.

Frequently asked questions

Does Order 888 require ownership unbundling of transmission assets?

No. Order 888 required functional unbundling—separating transmission operations, employees, and information from generation and marketing—not mandatory divestiture of transmission ownership. Utilities could retain ownership while complying through organizational and operational firewalls.

What transmission services did Order 888 standardize?

Order 888 standardized firm and non-firm point-to-point transmission service, network integration transmission service for network customers, and a defined set of ancillary services. The pro forma OATT gave eligible customers comparable terms for scheduling, curtailment, and billing.

How does Order 888 relate to Order 889?

Order 888 established the OATT and open-access obligations; Order 889 is its companion rule requiring OASIS posting of ATC and pricing on a same-time basis and strengthening Standards of Conduct. Together they operationalized non-discriminatory transmission access.

Stay Ahead of FERC

Get daily digest emails on new FERC orders

TransANCHOR monitors FERC eLibrary around the clock and delivers AI-summarized digest emails on every new order the moment it drops. Browse past daily briefings.